Why Mercury exists
A connected device only earns its keep when a utility or a flexibility platform can rely on it to act predictably. Today that reliance is built one integration at a time. A device certified for one utility often will not work with another, even when both run a common protocol like OCPP. Every market ends up solving the same problem alone, and every new partner starts the integration again.
Scaling flexibility now sits on the policy agenda in the UK, the EU, Australia, and California, and on the commercial agenda of every manufacturer, retailer, and platform. What has been missing is a uniform approach any of them can point to. A single company could write one, but a competitor will not adopt a rival's standard, and a regulator will not reference it.
Mercury Consortium exists to be that neutral core - the part every market needs to scale flexibility, owned by no single vendor. It certifies what a device does for the grid to a defined class, so the integration is done once and every Mercury-aligned utility or platform can rely on it. The end state Mercury is building toward is a grid that can scale flexibility as fast as devices are adopted, because connecting them is no longer the bottleneck.

